LETTER FROM THE ROAD, 20
ELIAS AMIDON
26 JULY 2003, JERUSALEM, BETHLEHEM, RAMALLAH, HEBRON
(NOTE: I have nearly completed a three-week journey in Israel-Palestine.
My purpose has been to learn about the conflict here first-hand, and
to further several projects dedicated to nonviolent alternatives to
the violence. The following is the first of two letters of impressions
from my journey; the second letter will follow in a few days. -EA)
JESUS WEPT
“Bus
number 14 was blown up right there,” my guide told me, pointing
across the Jerusalem street. “Seventeen people were killed. And
over there a suicide bomber dressed as an orthodox Jew entered that
hospital on the corner and exploded himself, killing three people in
the lobby.”
We walked along the busy street, past falafel shops and clothing stores,
counting the deaths from each bombing until we lost count somewhere
past 200. Deaths on the Palestinian side, many of them innocent civilians,
are typically four times greater. But this is a strange calculus. It
is not possible for the mathematics of body counts to convey the shock
of violence that with each suicide, each explosion, each bullet, strikes
into the psyche of Israelis and Palestinians alike, devastating their
capacity for coexistence.
Violence
is never far from anyone’s awareness. Beneath its surface, Jerusalem,
or as the Arabs call it, Al-Quds, “The Holy”, is a city
of violence, and an icon for the whole world of the violence at the
heart of our claims of righteousness. I feel sick from the righteousness
here. The Jews are righteous. The Muslims are righteous. The Christian
Zionists are righteous. Ariel Sharon is righteous. Yasser Arafat is
righteous. The settlers are righteous. Hamas is righteous.
Jerusalem has been invaded and destroyed 18 times in the past 3000
years, its inhabitants raped, enslaved, and massacred, all by righteous,
angry men. The holy stones would weep if they could.
As Jesus drew near and came in sight of Jerusalem he shed tears
over it and said, “If you in your turn had only understood on
this day the message of peace!”
Lc 19, 41-42
“Jesus wept.” I remember as a young man I was told by a
professor that this was the most profound sentence ever written. More
than once during my journey here I’ve felt the ache of Jesus’s
weeping and resisted an urge to drop to my knees and pray to whatever
God there may be or whatever tenderness may still exist in our hearts
that the shock we feel at the horror of violence would tear through
our own claims of righteousness, all of us, whether we are pro-Israeli
or pro-Palestinian or pro-whatever, and teach us a different kind of
claim, a claim of forgiveness and kindness and devotion to joining together
in the creation of beauty, rather than in its destruction.
But forgiveness and kindness cannot grow in the conditions of separation
and distrust that dominate here. It astonishes me how little either
side knows of the other. In these three weeks I have had more access
to people and conditions on both sides of the conflict
than nearly every Israeli or Palestinian I have met. It is illegal for
Israelis and Palestinians to cross the line into each other’s
realms. Israelis have little idea how much suffering their government’s
policies are inflicting every moment on Palestinians living in the occupied
territories. Similarly, Palestinians have little idea how toxic the
militants’ acts of violence are to the Israelis, and to their
own quest for freedom. Each side is caught in a repeating cycle of ignorance,
fear, and demonization of the other. Each is convinced the other wants
to annihilate them.
Of course, the conflict is not symmetrical. Israel has immensely more
military, economic, and organizational power than the Palestinians have.
But with all that power, the Israeli side is continually weakened and
made more vulnerable by its own self-destructive policies. It is painfully
obvious that Israel’s greatest enemy is not the Palestinians or
the Arab world, but themselves. Let me give some examples:
Last
week I traveled down to the besieged city of Hebron. It is a difficult
journey. The Israeli Defense Force (IDF) has blockaded the road in three
places so buses and taxis have to stop at each one. Everyone gets out
and carries their babies and shopping bags up over two berms of rock
and rubble and along a 200 meter stretch of road to another congested
area where taxis and buses wait. This is repeated three times. People
are subject to harassment and many hours of waiting. It is hot and there
is no shade. The old people and mothers with babies suffer in particular.
I am told in winter it is much worse, when rains turn these areas to
mud. These checkpoints, called maksums, are in place all over
the occupied territories. There is little freedom of movement, which
results in economic paralysis, unemployment, broken families, and suffering
from lack of medicines and medical care. It is a breeding ground for
anger.
Once
in Hebron, one of the largest cities in the West Bank, I am shown where
the IDF came two months ago with bulldozers and tanks and crushed all
the market stalls in the two central shopping districts. They pushed
all the rubbish into a schoolyard, and then proceeded to dig wide trenches
across all four roads leading to the market, going deep enough to break
through the electrical lines and water mains. I ask what the provocation
was, was there an attack or bombing? No, no attack, the Palestinians
tell me. “The IDF just wants to make life difficult for us. There
is no military purpose to this destruction. They harass us until we
hit back, so they have an excuse to move in with force, take more land
and buildings, and impose 24-hour curfews for weeks at a time.”
In Hebron the root cause of the distress is the existence of four small
settlements of militant Orthodox settlers in the center of the Old City.
There are about 450 settlers living in these settlements. Like Jerusalem,
Hebron is the site of a holy place sacred to both Jews and Muslims:
The Tomb of the Patriarchs/Abraham Mosque. This is where the militant
settler Baruch Goldstein massacred 29 Muslims at prayer in 1995. This
attack led to further revenge attacks from the Palestinians. The IDF
has imposed a lockdown on whole areas of the Old City, causing shops
to go out of business and schools to close for long periods.
I
stay with a contingent of the Christian Peacemaker Team (CPT) in a house
they have rented in the very center of the Old City. This brave band
of activists, about ten of them ranging in age from 25 to 70, monitors
the situation here, providing “protective accompaniment”
to Palestinian shopkeepers, farmers, and children walking to school
(the children are regularly attacked and spit upon by settlers). Team
members send out daily reports on the situation by email. From the roof
of the CPT house you can see the settlers’ buildings surrounded
by IDF machine gun nests perched on the corners of rooftops. The settlers’
freedom of movement is protected by the IDF while the Palestinians are
virtually imprisoned in their own city.
In the early evening, the curfew having been lifted this day, I go
to an open square filled with Palestinian children and parents enjoying
the summer night. I speak with a Palestinian man there who tells me
how, three years earlier, a settler had driven his jeep right into this
man’s coffee shop. The settler jumped out of his vehicle and said
it was his shop now, that this was the land of Israel and it was for
Israelis only. Then he hit the owner in the face. Soldiers arrived and
arrested not the settler but the shop owner! Since then his shop has
been closed, and, he told me, “Now I work in a leather factory,
but there is not enough money to feed my children. What hope do I have?
You see me smile at you, but if you could see inside my heart it is
black.”
For two days I hear stories like this of settler and IDF brutality,
many much worse. (If you doubt this, please take the time to read the
CPT reports available on-line at www.cpt.org
as well as the excellent reports written by Jerry Levin, a former CNN
bureau chief in Beirut and a long-time CPT member in Hebron, available
by request from Jerry at jlevin0320@yahoo.com.)
What’s going on? Why do the Israelis persist in building settlements
within the limited areas of the West Bank and Gaza when there are large
tracts of open land in Israel? Why do they continue to punish all Palestinians
because of the violence of a few?
“We are the Jews of the Jews!” the Palestinians say. “They
put us in ghettoes, they control every part of our lives, they hate
us and kill us! Of course people resist in whatever way they can. In
the history of the world there is no example of an occupied people who
did not resist.”
I have asked every Israeli Jew I met why Israeli policy seems to be
aimed at provoking Palestinian resentment. I have talked with ultra-orthodox
rabbis, politically progressive rabbis, secular leftists, rightists,
and academics. Though each person has their own particular bias, their
views ultimately refer to the same emotional sub-strata: the history
of Jewish persecution and the Jews’ determination not to be subjected
to it any longer.
A typical conversation is like the one I had with Benjamin Pogrund,
director of the Yakar Center for Social Concern in Jerusalem. He is
a thoughtful, well-spoken man who has a deep commitment to justice.
When I ask him why Israel seems to incite Palestinian wrath in so many
ways, he responds,
“Yes,
I know, I know, terrible things are being done by Israel to the Palestinians.
Israel is in danger of losing her soul. But you must remember there
are no straight lines. As soon as we attained statehood in 1948 we were
attacked and if we hadn’t resisted we would have been destroyed.
The experience of the holocaust and 2500 years of persecution demands
that we hold onto this state, a haven for Jews everywhere.”
Most of the Israelis I speak with seem conflicted by this same contradiction
between their unshakeable faithfulness to Israel’s survival and
the recognition that their presence in this land has made others homeless
and hopeless. It seems to be the unspoken equation the Israeli government,
and many Jews world-wide, has accepted: the existence of Israel requires
the oppression of the Palestinians.
To me, this equation reveals a tragic failure of imagination. If Israel’s
survival necessitates oppression of others then it has indeed lost its
soul. And if it has lost its soul, what is surviving?
Last night I was invited to a Sabbath dinner with five Israeli professionals
in their mid-thirties. The dinner conversation was intelligent, articulate,
and troubled by this same contradiction. During the dinner, Moshe, a
sensitive young man born into an ultra-Orthodox community, told us how
he was raised to distrust and hate Arabs because they only wanted to
destroy the Jews. He was taught the only thing Arabs respect is force.
Then
he hesitated a moment, as if the truth wasn’t quite being spoken.
“There is something else you should know. From what I’ve
said, you might think ultra-Orthodox Jews are hate-filled bigots with
cold hearts. It’s not true. If you were to walk into the community
where I grew up, you would meet saints. I mean it. The same people who
are militantly anti-Arab are the most compassionate, caring, and generous
people I know. If I had an accident or got sick, God forbid, they would
give selflessly of their time, energy, and money to help me. Whatever
I might need, they would be there for me.”
His comment made me wonder. The imperative of Israel’s survival
and the continuity of Jewish identity has created an insular, inward-directed
ethic. For these Jews, and it seems for much of the Jewish State, kindness
of heart is nurtured within the community, but not offered outward.
If this is so, I asked the group, isn’t the greatest challenge
for contemporary Israel the need to break free from this insularity?
“Wouldn’t Israel’s best strategy,” I asked,
“be to love their neighbors, rather than defend against them?
Ending the occupation, removing the settlements, taking down that wall,
helping Palestinians build homes and jobs, sharing the water instead
of keeping it for themselves, wouldn’t these actions ensure Israel’s
survival, body and soul, more than its present course?”
Moshe answered. “Yes, they would. But we need help. Think of
a woman who has been sexually abused in her earlier life, and who now
is in a relationship. If her partner wants to gain her trust, he has
to help make the whole context of the relationship safe for her. Then
she may open up.”
It was a prescient comment. And yet, later that night as I fell asleep,
I remembered the words of a veteran Palestinian peace-worker I had met
some days earlier. Her life was severely compromised by the occupation.
When I spoke to her of the need for Palestinians to acknowledge the
history of Jewish suffering, she said, “I know. We’ve done
that. But I’m tired of accommodating the psyche of my oppressor.”
Both these lovers, locked in their unavoidable embrace
on the same land, need each other to offer safety first, and neither
can.